Re: [PATCH v2 10/15] tools/rv: Add BPF monitors

[Nam Cao]

Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> That could work, though we'd lose some ergonomics around filtering events, not
> so much in the unified tracepoint thing but in what fields events have. We would
> need to parse a string (so I wonder if globs can express constraints like
> matching whole words or we'd need to arrange the format to accommodate glob
> limitations).

Yes. But the transition event thingy (not sure what we are naming that)
is only for debugging RV, and the error event should not appear
often. So I think some parsing overhead is not much of an issue.

Nam