Re: [PATCH net] xsk: restore UMEM flags after failed pool assignment

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Thu, 22 Oct 2026 19:10:08 +0200 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> > Right, evidence suggests igc handles it gracefully, I had attempted 
> > to provide multiple examples of real world impact to satiate Sashiko,
> > but only igc survived final edit. It needs to be open for the failed 
> > bind and successful retry, it can be closed after and bad state 
> > remains. If you're looking for greater impact, look at stmmac. I'll
> > send out a v2 without naming drivers specifically soon.  
> 
> Not really needed to go with v2 with reworded message. Let us wait for
> bot reports first.

Bots look happy, but I'm slightly confused by Paul's "only igc survived
final edit" statement. Was this issue discovered in normal development
or by an LLM bug hunt? Was it tested on I225-V hardware, or LLM just
suggest that HW as a NIC that would be impacted?