Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] mfd: qcom-pm8008: Tolerate missing interrupt

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 10/19/26 7:01 AM, Jishnu Prakash wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
> 
> On 10/15/2026 5:35 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 10/14/26 12:32 PM, Jishnu Prakash wrote:
>>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[...]

> And another point we should note is, the MFD cell name
> "qpnp-temp-alarm" used right now does not bind to our temp-alarm
> driver and this was intentional, as explained by Johan Hovold
> in his change (mfd: pm8008: Rework to match new DT binding),
> in the last paragraph of the commit message:
> 
>     Finally, note that the temperature alarm and GPIO subdrivers need some
>     minor rework before they can be used with non-SPMI devices like the
>     PM8008. The temperature alarm MFD cell name specifically uses a "qpnp"
>     rather than "spmi" prefix to prevent binding until the driver has been
>     updated.
> 
> Since these changes are not yet done, we cannot use
> temp-alarm for PM8008 or PM8010 over I2C for now.

I read that as one more reason to shave off said diff

Konrad