Re: Missing signoff in the clk tree

[Brian Masney]

Hi Mark,

On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 10:03 AM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 08:08:51PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 08:01:34PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 02:53:25PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 02, 2026 at 07:12:40PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > > Commits
> > > > >
> > > > >   d31b7d87d1b28 ("clk: nuvoton: ma35d1: Add missing WDT/WWDT parent clocks")
> > > > >   488d2cfdf3c99 ("dt-bindings: clock: ma35d1: Add missing WDT/WWDT parent clocks")
> > > > >   9546425453234 ("dt-bindings: clock: ma35d1: Drop CLK_MAX_IDX define")
> > > > >   ea2ee01da5555 ("dt-bindings: clock: ma35d1: Document the missing crystal inputs")
> > > > >   35ba0118dac01 ("clk: nuvoton: ma35d1: Keep the clock count in the driver")
> > > > >   e92291a009f7c ("clk: clk-gpio: do not blame the DT property on probe deferral")
> > > > >
> > > > > are missing a Signed-off-by from their committers
> > > >
> > > > This issue is still present today.
> > >
> > > And today.
> >
> > And today.
>
> And today.  I see the commits were actually done by Brian (CCed), who
> also appears to be a new maintainer for the clock tree - I guess the
> contacts for the tree need updating to include him?

I will fix that this evening. Sorry about that.

Jerome and I were added as the new co-maintainers and we are listed in
the MAINTAINERS file. Is there somewhere else that we should be added
for linux-clk?

Brian