Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] mm/shmem: various (urgent?) fixes

[David Hildenbrand (Arm)]

On 10/27/26 14:27, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 10/27/26 14:20, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/27/26 9:03 PM, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> see v1 for details. TL;DR various fixes.
>>>
>>> I now rebased on top of mm-stable (thanks Zi!) and retested with
>>> Gregory's tests (thanks!). Thanks everyone for the fast review!
>>>
>>> When sending this upstream there will be one conflict with the following
>>> upstream commit:
>>>
>>>     737362c7012a ("fs: port ->set_acl() to pass const mnt_idmap")
>>>
>>> Which should get resolved through something like
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
>>> --- a/mm/shmem.c
>>> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
>>> @@
>>> -static int shmem_set_acl(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct dentry *dentry,
>>> +static int shmem_set_acl(const struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct dentry *dentry,
>>>           struct posix_acl *acl, int type)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Rebased on mm-stable
>>>   - Fixup shmem_set_acl() compilation issue after rebase
>>>   - Dropped: "mm/shmem: avoid moving the truncation start backwards"
>>>   - Fixed up: "mm/shmem: stop retrying folios that cannot be split"
>>> - In "hugetlbfs: enforce F_SEAL_EXEC in setattr", check for S_ISREG
>>> - Smaller patch description fixups
>>> - Picked up tags
>>> - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20261026-fixes_shmem-
>>> v1-0-703206d5fa0c@xxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> why drop this fix "mm/shmem: hold off eviction in shmem_writeout()" from v2?
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261026-fixes_shmem-v1-6-703206d5fa0c@xxxxxxxxxx/#t
> 
> Because I'm stupid and dropped two commit instead of one :(
> 

I'll wait a bit and then send v3 fairly aggressively, including again: