Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_fs: Remove deprecated dma_fence->ops
From: Paul Cercueil
Date: Thu Oct 29 2026 - 09:20:34 EST
Hi Philipp,
Le jeudi 29 octobre 2026 à 13:51 +0100, Philipp Stanner a écrit :
> The dma_fence_ops function ops->release() has been deprecated because it
> prevents drivers from unloading. f_fs's implementation merely frees the
> fence. The dma_fence backend performs this deallocation automatically in
> the correct manner if ops->release() is not implemented.
>
> The backend simultaneously correctly frees struct ffs_dma_fence since
> struct dma_fence is its base class.
For context, this .release() callback was added to avoid the implicit free of
the base class, which IIRC was a request I got during the review process of this
change set.
I'm personally fine with the change, but do we need a "keep this field at the
top" comment for the base class in the ffs_dma_fence struct? Or what's the
policy here?
Cheers,
-Paul
>
> Remove ops->release().
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c | 9 ---------
> 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
> b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
> index c64a268e98a4..e8672b37e890 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
> @@ -1479,18 +1479,9 @@ static const char *ffs_dmabuf_get_timeline_name(struct
> dma_fence *fence)
> return "";
> }
>
> -static void ffs_dmabuf_fence_release(struct dma_fence *fence)
> -{
> - struct ffs_dma_fence *dma_fence =
> - container_of(fence, struct ffs_dma_fence, base);
> -
> - kfree(dma_fence);
> -}
> -
> static const struct dma_fence_ops ffs_dmabuf_fence_ops = {
> .get_driver_name = ffs_dmabuf_get_driver_name,
> .get_timeline_name = ffs_dmabuf_get_timeline_name,
> - .release = ffs_dmabuf_fence_release,
> };
>
> static int ffs_dma_resv_lock(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, bool nonblock)