Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: Improve wording in Sphinx dependency checker

[Randy Dunlap]

On 10/29/26 5:51 AM, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> 
> On 10/28/26 8:07 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/27/26 10:07 AM, Dongliang Mu wrote:
>>> @@ -784,10 +782,10 @@ class SphinxDependencyChecker(MissingCheckers):
>>>               if not self.distro_msg:
>>>                   self.distro_msg = \
>>>                       "Note: RHEL-based distros typically require extra repositories.\n" \
>>> -                    "For most, enabling epel and crb are enough:\n" \
>>> +                    "For most, enabling EPEL and CRB is enough:\n" \
>> I think that "are" is correct here since the subject is plural.
> 
> 
> From my understanding, enabling XXX is the subject, so I change it to "is". However, this is not very clear.
> 
> How about "For most, the EPEL and CRB repositories are enough:\n"? This seems more clear.

Fine with me. Thanks.

-- 
~Randy