Re: [GIT PULL] sparc updates for v7.4

[Andreas Larsson]

On 2026-10-29 23:49, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> No. The fix is to NOT REBASE POINTLESSLY.
> 
> And no, adding a "tested-by" is simply not a good enough reason to
> rebase long after-the-fact.
Understood. This was my mistake. I was trying to do the right thing and
clearly did not. Sorry about that.

Just to be clear, the followup pull request for sparc-for-7.4-tag2 I did
in this thread is for what has actually been in linux-next. Each commit
there was pushed to my for-next the same day as I committed it.

> And if you have a *major* and actual real reason to rebase (completely
> broken history that needs to be fixed), it should be mentioned and
> explained.

Understood. Sorry for the mess.

Best regards,
Andreas