Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] tpm_crb: Add command and response buffer chunking support
From: Jarkko Sakkinen
Date: Fri Oct 30 2026 - 12:02:26 EST
On Fri, Oct 30, 2026 at 01:30:21AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 11:45:34PM +0530, Arun Menon wrote:
> > The new version of TCG TPM v185 [1] supports sending data/commands in
> > chunks for the CRB (Command Response Buffer) interface. This is in line
> > with the initiative to support PQC algorithms.
> >
> > This series implements the logic to send and receive larger TPM
> > cmd/rsp between the linux guest and the TPM backend in chunks.
> > Currently, the TPM CRB driver is limited by the physical size of the
> > MMIO window. When userspace attempts to send a payload that exceeds this
> > size, the driver rejects it.
> >
> > This series introduces chunking support. The driver now checks the CRB
> > interface capability for CRB_INTF_CAP_CRB_CHUNK. If supported by the
> > backend, the driver will slice oversized commands into MMIO-sized
> > chunks, signalling the backend via CRB_START_NEXT_CHUNK, and finalizing
> > with CRB_START_INVOKE. Responses are also read back in a similar chunked
> > manner.
> >
> > If the backend does not support chunking, the driver retains its legacy
> > behaviour and enforces the standard size limits.
> >
> > This feature also requires the QEMU to interpret the data in chunks and
> > forward it to the TPM backend and subsequently dispatch the TPM response
> > in chunks back to the linux guest. This is implemented in [2] and
> > already merged into the mainline.
> >
> > The whole series applied on top of for-next-tpm (including prerequisite)
> > can be found here:
> > https://github.com/armenon-rh/linux/tree/tpm-crb-linux
> >
> > [1] https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/PC-Client-Specific-Platform-TPM-Profile-for-TPM-2p0-v1p07_Pub.pdf
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20260601215410.517009-1-stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > v5
> > --
> > - Split [PATCH v4 06/06] into 2. The preparation patch separates the
> > no-chunking send() and recv() from chunking.
> > - Fixed block comments to respect kernel's preferred multi-line style.
> > - Added citations to the TCG TPM and NIST FIPS documentations. Explained
> > the logic and newly introduced registers in brief in the git commit
> > message.
> >
> > v4
> > --
> > - Rebased on master (or for-next-tpm, both point to the same commit).
> > - Resolved one conflict in PATCH v3 05/06, as TPM_BUFSIZE is declared in
> > include/linux/tpm_command.h.
> >
> > v3
> > --
> > - Split patch 2, so that the code is cleaner.
> > - Re-order the buffer size adjustment patch.
> > - Rename crb_trigger_tpm to tpm_crb_start.
> > - Add dispatching logic in send and recv functions. Chunking is
> > separated from no-chunking for clarity.
> > - Increase TPM_BUFSIZE in the common file include/linux/tpm.h following,
> > [PATCH v9 11/11] tpm-buf: Implement managed allocations
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20260125192526.782202-12-jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > v2
> > --
> > - Add size checks before copying memory.
> > - Update TPM_BUFSIZE to 8KB.
> > - Commit messages updated to indicate motivation and logic of the change.
> >
> > Arun Menon (7):
> > tpm_crb: Add register definitions of TPM CRB chunking fields
> > tpm_crb: Split start method into a separate header
> > tpm_crb: Add start_cmd parameter to tpm_crb_start wrapper
> > tpm: tis_i2c: Use local 4KB buffer to limit memory usage
> > tpm: Increase TPM_BUFSIZE to 8KB for chunking support
> > tpm_crb: Factor crb_send()/crb_recv() bodies into helpers
> > tpm_crb: Implement command and response chunking logic
> >
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 226 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c.c | 6 +-
> > include/linux/tpm_command.h | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.56.0
> >
>
> Applied, thank you.
Could you send +1 version that:
1. Applies to my master.
2. There was one issue that kernel test bot complained.
The issue:
>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c:464:34: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
No worries, just every other day stuff but would help me if you carry
out these, thanks. And yeah, the first one is not even a real issue,
just unfortuate coincident :-)
I'll apply it as soon as I get it.
Br, Jarkko