Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpftool: Preserve unsigned enum64 values in data dumps

From: Alexei Starovoitov

Date: Sat Oct 31 2026 - 18:59:20 EST


On Sat, Oct 31, 2026 at 03:36 PM Hungyu Lin <dennylin0707@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -204,7 +204,10 @@ static int btf_dumper_enum64(const struct btf_dumper *d,
> - jsonw_int(d->jw, value);
> + if (btf_kflag(t))
> + jsonw_int(d->jw, value);
> + else
> + jsonw_uint(d->jw, value);

btf_dumper_enum() has the same problem.

Fix all in one patch:

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c
index 3267163..09dd428 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c
@@ -149,7 +149,8 @@ static int btf_dumper_enum(const struct btf_dumper *d,
const void *data)
{
const struct btf_enum *enums = btf_enum(t);
- __s64 value;
+ bool is_signed = btf_kflag(t);
+ __s64 value, val;
__u32 i;

switch (t->size) {
@@ -157,20 +158,21 @@ static int btf_dumper_enum(const struct btf_dumper *d,
value = *(__s64 *)data;
break;
case 4:
- value = *(__s32 *)data;
+ value = is_signed ? (__s64)*(__s32 *)data : *(__u32 *)data;
break;
case 2:
- value = *(__s16 *)data;
+ value = is_signed ? *(__s16 *)data : *(__u16 *)data;
break;
case 1:
- value = *(__s8 *)data;
+ value = is_signed ? *(__s8 *)data : *(__u8 *)data;
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}

for (i = 0; i < btf_vlen(t); i++) {
- if (value == enums[i].val) {
+ val = is_signed ? (__s64)enums[i].val : (__u32)enums[i].val;
+ if (value == val) {
jsonw_string(d->jw,
btf__name_by_offset(d->btf,
enums[i].name_off));
@@ -178,7 +180,10 @@ static int btf_dumper_enum(const struct btf_dumper *d,
}
}

- jsonw_int(d->jw, value);
+ if (is_signed)
+ jsonw_int(d->jw, value);
+ else
+ jsonw_uint(d->jw, value);
return 0;
}

@@ -204,7 +209,10 @@ static int btf_dumper_enum64(const struct btf_dumper *d,
}
}

- jsonw_int(d->jw, value);
+ if (btf_kflag(t))
+ jsonw_int(d->jw, value);
+ else
+ jsonw_uint(d->jw, value);
return 0;
}


pw-bot: cr