Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: check the recvmsg LSM hook for every recvmmsg entry
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima
Date: Sun Nov 01 2026 - 10:43:15 EST
On Sat, 31 Oct 2026 13:08:41 +0200, Avi Weiss wrote:
> do_recvmmsg() passes the number of received datagrams as the nosec
> argument to ___sys_recvmsg(). After the first datagram, this bypasses
> security_socket_recvmsg() even when a later entry requests a larger
> receive buffer that would be rejected by an LSM policy.
Same question, what is the real use case ?
>
> Pass zero for both native and compat entries so each receive goes
> through the security check. Remove the first-datagram-only comment.
>
> Fixes: a2e2725541fa ("net: Introduce recvmmsg socket syscall")
Remove this.
> Signed-off-by: Avi Weiss <thnkslprpt@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/socket.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
> index c2a85224ab55..fff80fbca1a8 100644
> --- a/net/socket.c
> +++ b/net/socket.c
> @@ -3057,13 +3057,10 @@ static int do_recvmmsg(int fd, struct mmsghdr __user *mmsg,
> compat_entry = (struct compat_mmsghdr __user *)mmsg;
>
> while (datagrams < vlen) {
> - /*
> - * No need to ask LSM for more than the first datagram.
> - */
> if (MSG_CMSG_COMPAT & flags) {
> err = ___sys_recvmsg(sock, (struct user_msghdr __user *)compat_entry,
> &msg_sys, flags & ~MSG_WAITFORONE,
> - datagrams);
> + 0);
> if (err < 0)
> break;
> err = put_user(err, &compat_entry->msg_len);
> @@ -3072,7 +3069,7 @@ static int do_recvmmsg(int fd, struct mmsghdr __user *mmsg,
> err = ___sys_recvmsg(sock,
> (struct user_msghdr __user *)entry,
> &msg_sys, flags & ~MSG_WAITFORONE,
> - datagrams);
> + 0);
This makes nosec dead in every path.
---
pw-bot: cr
> if (err < 0)
> break;
> err = put_user(err, &entry->msg_len);
> --
> 2.43.0
>