Re: [PATCH net] tcp: initialize send sequence numbers before deferring TFO

From: Qingfang Deng

Date: Mon Nov 02 2026 - 02:42:55 EST


On 2026/11/2 14:11, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
On 11/2/26 11:59 AM, Qingfang Deng wrote:
TCP_FASTOPEN_CONNECT can return from connect() before tcp_connect_init()
when a cached cookie or cookieless Fast Open allows deferring the SYN.
At this point write_seq contains the initial sequence number, while
snd_una and snd_nxt have not been initialized to that sequence number.

Consequently, inet_diag and /proc/net/tcp{,6} report the initial
sequence number as the send queue length despite no SYN or payload being
queued.

Initialize snd_una and snd_nxt to write_seq before marking the
connection as deferred. Both sequence-based queue lengths then remain
zero until the first write starts the connection and runs
tcp_connect_init().

This patch looks good to me. But idiag_wqueue can still go negative
on the normal connect path, since the socket is already hashed and
diag does not take the socket lock. We always set write_seq first,
then init snd_una later:

  tcp_v4_connect
    WRITE_ONCE(tp->write_seq, st.seq)
    tcp_connect
      tcp_connect_init
        WRITE_ONCE(tp->snd_una, tp->write_seq)

Can you try this instead?

  r->idiag_wqueue = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_wmem_queued) ?
                    READ_ONCE(tp->write_seq) - READ_ONCE(tp->snd_una) : 0;

This does not guarantee the load order on a weakly-ordered CPU. LLM suggests using this load-acquire/store-release sequence:

r->idiag_wqueue = smp_load_acquire(&sk->sk_wmem_queued) ? READ_ONCE(tp->write_seq) - READ_ONCE(tp->snd_una) : 0;

Then in tcp_connect_queue_skb(), replace sk_wmem_queued_add() with smp_store_release():

/* Paired with smp_load_acquire() in tcp_diag_get_info(). */
smp_store_release(&sk->sk_wmem_queued, sk->sk_wmem_queued + skb->truesize);

What do you think?