Re: [PATCH v1] PCI: endpoint: Skip upper halves of 64-bit BARs during search

[Manikanta Maddireddy]

On 21/10/26 7:55 pm, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 12:46:03PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 01:36:44PM +0530, Manikanta Maddireddy wrote:
> > > pci_epc_get_next_free_bar() skips the upper half of a 64-bit BAR only
> > > when it is the starting BAR. If the search subsequently passes a
> > > reserved or disabled 64-bit BAR, it can return its upper half as an
> > > independent BAR because that slot has a default programmable descriptor.
> > >
> > > For example, Tegra exposes a programmable 64-bit BAR0 and reserved
> > > 64-bit BAR2 and BAR4. A search starting at BAR1 skips BAR1 and BAR2,
> > > then incorrectly returns BAR3. The next search can similarly return
> > > BAR5, causing the EPF test driver to allocate and program BARs that
> > > belong to the reserved hardware windows.
>
> > 12a22fb38cbb ("PCI: tegra194: Expose BAR2 (MSI-X) and BAR4 (DMA) as
> > 64-bit BAR_RESERVED").
> >
> >
> > I'm fine with this patch, but I think you need to rephrase the kdoc
> > to reflect this new reality, because currently the kdoc is confusing/
> > not in line with the 'new' meaning of BAR_RESERVED, which can contain
> > MSI-X table etc.
>
> To clarify, I can see that you updated the definition in:
> 27ce1d8ecb9b ("PCI: endpoint: Allow only_64bit on BAR_RESERVED")
>
>
> But, IMO it is still not super clear.
>
> Perhaps we should have mentioned explicitly that only_64bit is
> also allowed on a BAR_RESERVED, if that reserved BAR is 64-bit.
> (Since that use case is different from what the kdoc currently
> says.)
>
>
> I also think that this patch needs a Fixes tag with either:
> 27ce1d8ecb9b ("PCI: endpoint: Allow only_64bit on BAR_RESERVED")
> or
> 12a22fb38cbb ("PCI: tegra194: Expose BAR2 (MSI-X) and BAR4 (DMA) as
> 64-bit BAR_RESERVED")
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Niklas

Hi,

I will send V2 with kdoc update and Fixes tag.

- Manikanta

--
nvpublic