RE: [PATCH v6 0/4] pps-gpio: restore pin mux on unbind and shutdown

[Farber, Eliav]

On 24/09/2026 15:59, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> I applied the series here on v7.3-rc4: it applies cleanly, checkpatch
> --strict is quiet on all four patches, and drivers/pps builds with W=1
> and CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_TIMERS=y.  I have acked the four patches
> individually.
>
> Andrew, could you please pick this up?  LinuxPPS has no tree of its
> own.

Hi Andrew,

Following up on Rodolfo's request above. The awkward part here is mine: v6
had you on Cc rather than To, and I posted it as a reply to v5 rather than
its own thread, so the patches are addressed to other people and buried
mid-thread. Happy to fix that if it helps.

The series is unchanged since v6 and has no outstanding review comments.
I re-checked it today and all four patches still apply cleanly on v7.4-rc1.
v6 is nested in the v5 thread, here:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260922103051.5257-1-farbere@xxxxxxxxxx/T/

Tags collected after v6 was posted:

Patch 1: Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
		 Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Patch 2: Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
		 Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Patch 3: Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
		 Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Patch 4: Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
		 Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@xxxxxxxxxx>

Patches 1 and 2 are fixes with Fixes: tags; 3 and 4 are the feature.

> One leftover from the v5 review, not a blocker: the new shutdown()
> runs on every board, including the ones that describe no "inactive"
> state [...] If the series needs a respin for some other reason, a line
> there would be worth having -- otherwise it is fine as it stands.

Noted, and nothing in the code depends on it.

Would you rather I repost as a standalone v7 thread, with that note folded
into patch 4 and the tags above applied? That would also put the patches in
front of you properly addressed. Happy either way -- just say which you
prefer.

Thanks,
Eliav