Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] get_maintainer: stop sending every patch to LKML

Next message: Elliot Berman: "[PATCH 6.1.y 2/2] bs/ntfs3: fix NULL folio dereference in ntfs_lock_new_page()"
Previous message: Abel Vesa: "[PATCH 2/2] PM: sleep: Do not arm wakeup IRQs for hibernation freeze and quiesce"
In reply to: Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel): "Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] get_maintainer: stop sending every patch to LKML"
Next in thread: Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel): "Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] get_maintainer: stop sending every patch to LKML"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Jonathan Corbet

Date: Mon Nov 02 2026 - 10:10:14 EST

"Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> So it occurred to me that it might be actually better to stop sending
> messages directly to LKML subscribers and only make it available for
> download somewhere and as a Lore archive.
>
> Is there really anyone depending on receiving all of the LKML traffic every day?

* raises hand

Some of us crazy people really do depend on it, yes.

jon