Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] bpftool: Preserve unsigned enum values in data dumps

[Quentin Monnet]

On 01/11/2026 11:32, Hungyu Lin wrote:
> btf_dumper_enum() loads ordinary enum data as signed and uses signed
> numeric output. Unsigned values with the high bit set can therefore be
> printed as negative numbers. Narrow unsigned values also fail to match
> their enumerators: an eight-bit 0xff is loaded as -1, while its named
> value is stored as 255.
> 
> btf_dumper_enum64() likewise uses signed numeric output for unmatched
> values. For example, 0x8000000000000001 is printed as
> -9223372036854775807 instead of 9223372036854775809.
> 
> Load the data according to the enum's signedness, use btf_enum_value()
> for name matching, and select the numeric writer according to kflag.
> 
> Retain the original signed-width comparison and give it priority over
> new matches. This preserves names from older BTF without signedness,
> including eight-byte ordinary enums, and keeps the selected name when
> multiple enumerators could match. Remember the first normalized match
> while looking for an original match so only one scan is needed.
> 
> For an eight-byte BTF_KIND_ENUM with kflag clear, a negative stored
> enumerator can therefore match both its sign- and zero-extended values.
> The record cannot distinguish legacy signed metadata from unsigned
> metadata with the same bits.
> 
> Unmatched values are printed as unsigned when kflag is clear. This
> includes BTF read back from kernels without enum64 support, where libbpf
> clears kflag before loading. The original signedness cannot be recovered
> from that flag.
> 
> Fixes: ca7e6e45d108 ("bpftool: Print the enum's name instead of value")
> Fixes: 58a53978fdf6 ("bpftool: Add btf enum64 support")
> Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Hungyu Lin <dennylin0707@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c
> index 3267163119dc..792e210cb503 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c
> @@ -148,37 +148,50 @@ static int btf_dumper_enum(const struct btf_dumper *d,
>  			    const struct btf_type *t,
>  			    const void *data)
>  {
> -	const struct btf_enum *enums = btf_enum(t);
> -	__s64 value;
> +	const struct btf_enum *enums = btf_enum(t), *match = NULL;
> +	bool is_signed = btf_kflag(t);
> +	__s64 value, legacy_value;
>  	__u32 i;
>  
>  	switch (t->size) {
>  	case 8:
> -		value = *(__s64 *)data;
> +		legacy_value = *(__s64 *)data;
> +		value = legacy_value;


Not sure that's worth a respin, but "legacy_value" will lose its meaning
in time, maybe name it "signed_value" instead?

Looks good to me otherwise:

Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@xxxxxxxxxx>