Re: [PATCH -next] crypto: asymmetric_keys: verify_pefile: fix integer underflow in pefile_strip_sig_wrapper

Next message: Daniel Pereira: "Re: [RFC PATCH v2 12/13] Documentation: entry: Describe the pre-counted hardirq lifecycle"
Previous message: Pablo Neira Ayuso: "Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: do not pair an expired start with another interval's end"
In reply to: Ignat Korchagin: "Re: [PATCH -next] crypto: asymmetric_keys: verify_pefile: fix integer underflow in pefile_strip_sig_wrapper"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Gu Bowen

Date: Mon Nov 02 2026 - 21:40:13 EST

On 11/3/2026 4:49 AM, Ignat Korchagin wrote:

nit: the subject line looks malformed: weird "-next" suffix pointing
nowhere. Otherwise:

Thanks for the review! You're right, the "-next" suffix was a mistake. Will drop "-next" in the subject.

Best Regards,
Guber