Re: [PATCH 3/5] ubifs: reject master nodes claiming a too small inode number

[shao.mingyin]

> This check could be merged into previous check:
>   f (c->highest_inum >= INUM_WATERMARK)

Agreed, the two bounds belong in one test:

	if (c->highest_inum >= INUM_WATERMARK ||
	    c->highest_inum < UBIFS_FIRST_INO)

One side effect: a too small highest_inum then reports error 3 instead of
the separate code 24.  If you would rather keep the two ranges apart in
the log, I can leave the lower bound as its own check.

Thanks,
Shao