Re: [linus:master] [atomic] 80047d84ee: WARNING:at_include/linux/instrumented.h:#__split_huge_pmd_locked
From: David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Date: Tue Nov 03 2026 - 11:08:28 EST
On 11/3/26 16:43, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2026 13:26:47 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> AFAICT this is pxx_xchg64() from the PAE code operating on an on-stack
>> pmd value.
>>
>> The below 'fixes' it, but the question is of course, WTF are we using an
>> on-stack pmd value for set_pmd().
>>
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level_types.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level_types.h
>> @@ -5,12 +5,12 @@
>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLER__
>> #include <linux/types.h>
>>
>> -typedef u64 pteval_t;
>> -typedef u64 pmdval_t;
>> -typedef u64 pudval_t;
>> -typedef u64 p4dval_t;
>> -typedef u64 pgdval_t;
>> -typedef u64 pgprotval_t;
>> +typedef u64 __aligned(8) pteval_t;
>> +typedef u64 __aligned(8) pmdval_t;
>> +typedef u64 __aligned(8) pudval_t;
>> +typedef u64 __aligned(8) p4dval_t;
>> +typedef u64 __aligned(8) pgdval_t;
>> +typedef u64 __aligned(8) pgprotval_t;
>>
>
> (cc Dave)
>
> fwiw this was discussed a couple of years ago but nothing really came
> of it.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/20240401185451.6897208962d3fc47a12ffb5a@xxxxxxxx
IIUC Usama has some things in the works that will avoid on-stack pmds.
--
Cheers,
David