Re: [PATCH] docs/zh_CN: fix stale :Original: reference in xfrm_proc.rst

[Weijie Yuan]

On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 at 10:46:19PM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> 
> On 11/4/26 10:41 PM, Weijie Yuan wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 at 10:32:43PM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> > > On 9/20/26 3:31 PM, Rénich Bon ´Ciri´c wrote:
> > > > Commit 03e23b18c720 ("net: Move XFRM documentation into its own
> > > > subdirectory") relocated Documentation/networking/xfrm_proc.rst to
> > > > Documentation/networking/xfrm/xfrm_proc.rst.
> > > > 
> > > > The Simplified Chinese translation was not updated accordingly,
> > > > leaving its :Original: tag pointing to a nonexistent file and causing
> > > > tools/docs/documentation-file-ref-check to report an invalid reference.
> > > > 
> > > > Update the :Original: path to point to the new location.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: 03e23b18c720 ("net: Move XFRM documentation into its own subdirectory")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rénich Bon ´Ciri´c <renich@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Hi Rénich Bon ´Ciri,
> > > 
> > > I have proposed a patchset to revise all the inconsistency between the path
> > > of Chinese translation and English documentation and these invalid original
> > > fields.
> > > 
> > > Please refer to this patch - [PATCH v3 8/9] docs/zh_CN: update
> > > networking/xfrm/xfrm_proc.rst translation
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/c641a11c-39c8-40c4-b162-10f3a3db57ff@xxxxxxxxx/
> > Ah, I haven't had a chance to look carefully at your series yet. Then
> > this patch can be discarded in what's-cooking.
> 
> Haha, what's-cooking is really a good place for me to catch up all my
> missing patches.

Thank you!

https://buding.wyuan.org/ is an experimental dashboard for us which is
made weeks ago, but obviously it is very rough. So now I feel that
what's cooking is somehow enough for us, as it seems more robust than
web app. ;-)

> It seems all patches are reviewed, but some are waiting for the authors to
> revise.

Yes, thanks for your work!

Oh, btw two of my rerolled series are waiting for your review, but I
think they are both good to go, while I'm certainly biased. ;-)

* Weijie Yuan 2026-09-05
  [PATCH v2 0/2] docs/zh_CN: update maintainer/configure-git.rst
  [PATCH v2 1/2] docs/zh_CN: sync maintainer/configure-git with upstream
  [PATCH v2 2/2] docs/zh_CN: improve maintainer/pull-requests translation

  Needs review.
  source: <20260905-configure-git-v2-0-ab194db8c6b9@xxxxxxxxx>

* Weijie Yuan 2026-08-23
  [PATCH v2 0/5] Update maintainer-pgp-guide.rst Chinese translation
  [PATCH v2 1/5] docs/zh_CN: update maintainer-pgp-guide translation Weijie Yuan
  [PATCH v2 2/5] docs/zh_CN: clarify free Nitrokey requirements Weijie Yuan
  [PATCH v2 3/5] docs/zh_CN: update maintainer-pgp-guide kernel.org link Weijie Yuan
  [PATCH v2 4/5] docs/zh_CN: add kernel.org trust repository reference Weijie Yuan
  [PATCH v2 5/5] docs/zh_CN: remove empty proofreader field from maintainer PGP guide

  Needs review.
  source: <20260823-maintainer-pgp-guide-v2-0-bea33b2ece54@xxxxxxxxx>

They are revised per your guidance.

Thanks!