Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] dt-bindings: pps: pps-gpio: document optional pinctrl states

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 at 05:29:11PM +0000, Eliav Farber wrote:
> When the PPS input GPIO is routed through a pin controller, a board may
> need to mux those pins to a different function while pps-gpio is not
> driving PPS (for example after the driver is unbound or across a kexec).
> 
> Document the optional "default" and "inactive" pinctrl-names and show
> both in the example. The "default" state selects the PPS/GPIO function
> and is applied by the driver core before probe; the optional "inactive"
> state, when present, describes the mux to restore when the driver is
> unbound or the system is shut down. "default" is pinctrl-0, matching the
> implicit ordering the pinctrl core already assigns it, and "inactive" is
> pinctrl-1; the driver looks each state up by name.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eliav Farber <farbere@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
 
Acked-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>