Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: media: qcom,glymur-camss: Use CSIPHY indices for ports

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 05/11/2026 10:53, Loic Poulain wrote:
> So some chipsets share the same IP blocks, with some block/phy
> instances disabled. As a result, we need to decide whether we're
> numbering based on active instances or on the actual hardware instance
> index/offset. If we use active-instance numbering, then yes, it should
> be @2 (CSIPHY4 being the third active instance). Alternatively, if the
> port numbering is intended to reflect the hardware instance offset,
> matching the register prop, then @4 would be more appropriate. It also
> has the advantage of directly identifying the underlying hardware
> instance, without requiring any additional driver-side mapping. In any
> case, @3 is incorrect.
> 
> That said, since the bindings have already been merged in its current
> form, we'll need to preserve backward compatibility when addressing
> this.

This is the input port to camss, so how is it called in camss, not the
csi phy?


Best regards,
Krzysztof