Re: [PATCH 4/5] scsi: sd: drop the dead -EOVERFLOW branches

[Bart Van Assche]

On 11/5/26 3:33 AM, shao.mingyin@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> read_capacity_10() and read_capacity_16() no longer return -EOVERFLOW,
> so the two branches that check for it are dead.

Please mention in the patch description which commit removed the
-EOVERFLOW return statements, e.g. as follows: "Commit 72deb455b5ec
("block: remove CONFIG_LBDAF") removed the last -EOVERFLOW return
statements from read_capacity_10() and read_capacity_16()."

Thanks,

Bart.