Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: phy: qcom: Add common qcom,csi2-phy

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 03:51:34PM -0800, Anusha Arun Nandi wrote:
> SA8775P, QCS8300 and SC7280 CSI2 PHYs are bit-for-bit identical in
> devicetree shape (ports, bus-type, data-lanes, operating-points-v2,
> clocks, single "top" power-domain, vdda-hs/vdda-lp supplies).
> 
> Describe all three with a single qcom,csi2-phy.yaml and a compatible
> oneOf, rather than one standalone schema per SoC. QCS8300 is further
> required to be paired with a qcom,sa8775p-csi2-phy fallback
> compatible, the same way other Qualcomm bindings express full
> hardware compatibility between two SoCs (see qcom,qusb2-phy.yaml);
> this lets the driver bind QCS8300 nodes via its qcom,sa8775p-csi2-phy
> match entry rather than carrying a duplicate one.
> 
> qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml is a separate PHY with a different shape
> (3 clocks, 3 power-domains, different supply names, DPHY split-mode
> support) and is left untouched, but port@0's DPHY split-mode
> definition (two endpoints, lane-count constraint) is cloned into this
> schema rather than dropped, since this PHY supports the same split
> mode.
> 
> The supply names are vdda-hs/vdda-lp rather than the hardware's own
> power-rail names, since those names aren't guaranteed to stay
> consistent across future platforms using this binding.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jigarkumar Zala <jigarkumar.zala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I do not see how you answered my questions.

Dropping from DT patchwork.

Best regards,
Krzysztof