Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] remoteproc: sunxi: Add KUnit tests
From: kernel test robot
Date: Sun Nov 08 2026 - 00:14:20 EST
Hi Tim,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on 7649ba73f9e7e1e04d0b46213e39c79ae09dd55c]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tim-Michals/dt-bindings-mailbox-Add-Allwinner-A523-message-box/20261101-125729
base: 7649ba73f9e7e1e04d0b46213e39c79ae09dd55c
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261101185735.762559-8-tcmichals%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3 7/7] remoteproc: sunxi: Add KUnit tests
config: parisc-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20261108/202611081239.zlQqllPm-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
compiler: hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 16.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20261108/202611081239.zlQqllPm-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202611081239.zlQqllPm-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/kunit/device.h:16,
from drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:29:
drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c: In function 'expect_powered_off':
>> drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:962:64: error: 'struct dev_pm_info' has no member named 'usage_count'
962 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 0);
| ^
include/kunit/test.h:840:22: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
840 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1037:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION'
1037 | KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1034:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG'
1034 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:962:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
962 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 0);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:962:64: error: 'struct dev_pm_info' has no member named 'usage_count'
962 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 0);
| ^
include/kunit/test.h:840:38: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
840 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1037:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION'
1037 | KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1034:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG'
1034 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:962:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
962 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 0);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c: In function 'test_prepare_unprepare_order':
drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:977:64: error: 'struct dev_pm_info' has no member named 'usage_count'
977 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 1);
| ^
include/kunit/test.h:840:22: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
840 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1037:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION'
1037 | KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1034:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG'
1034 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:977:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
977 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 1);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:977:64: error: 'struct dev_pm_info' has no member named 'usage_count'
977 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 1);
| ^
include/kunit/test.h:840:38: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
840 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1037:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION'
1037 | KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1034:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG'
1034 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:977:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
977 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 1);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c: In function 'test_prepare_power_up_failure':
drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:1107:54: error: 'struct dev_pm_info' has no member named 'usage_count'
1107 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count), 0);
| ^
include/kunit/test.h:840:22: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
840 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1037:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION'
1037 | KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1034:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG'
1034 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:1107:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
1107 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count), 0);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:1107:54: error: 'struct dev_pm_info' has no member named 'usage_count'
1107 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count), 0);
| ^
include/kunit/test.h:840:38: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
840 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1037:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION'
1037 | KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1034:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG'
1034 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:1107:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
1107 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count), 0);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +962 drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c
949
950 /* Everything as before prepare(): resets asserted, clocks off, no PM reference */
951 static void expect_powered_off(struct kunit *test, struct test_context *ctx,
952 struct mock_providers *mp, bool core_held)
953 {
954 int i;
955
956 KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, mp->asserted[RST_CFG]);
957 KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, mp->asserted[RST_SRAM]);
958 KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, mp->asserted[RST_DEBUG]);
959 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mp->asserted[RST_CORE], core_held);
960 for (i = 0; i < NR_CLK; i++)
961 KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE_MSG(test, clk_hw_is_prepared(&mp->clk[i].hw), "clock %d", i);
> 962 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 0);
963 }
964
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki