Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: stm32_rproc: Do not request reset by index

[Mathieu Poirier]

On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 04:46:15PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> There is no need to request a single reset by index.
> Use devm_reset_control_get_exclusive() to request the first and only
> reset.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Applied.

Thanks,
Mathieu

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> index a47e040c6db8..1443a4013d6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> @@ -696,8 +696,8 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  
>  	ddata->rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional(dev, "mcu_rst");
>  	if (!ddata->rst) {
> -		/* Try legacy fallback method: get it by index */
> -		ddata->rst = devm_reset_control_get_by_index(dev, 0);
> +		/* Try legacy fallback method: get the first reset */
> +		ddata->rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
>  	}
>  	if (IS_ERR(ddata->rst))
>  		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(ddata->rst),
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 6628e7d4c6b25c8d18f1345e3a20d21829aae7e4
> change-id: 20261106-reset-deindex-rproc-3c1aa2e9325f
> 
> Best regards,
> --  
> Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>