Re: [PATCH v1 02/10] kconfig-checker: Introduce PREEMPT_RT configuration rules

[Ahmed S. Darwish]

On Sat, 07 Nov 2026, sashiko-bot@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Should this also check CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE?
>

Correct, it should be added, as legacy "compatible" CONFIG_NO_HZ might be
removed in the future.

>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Will any .config with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y or CONFIG_DEBUG_FS_ALLOW_NONE=y
> still fail against the CONFIG_DEBUG_.* pattern rule?
>

Correct, both CONFIG_DEBUG_FS_ALLOW_NONE and CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO.* should be
handled.

>
> [Severity: Low]
> Is this rationale meant for CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL rather than
> CONFIG_DEBUG_MISC?
>

Correct!

Thanks,
Ahmed