Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: Use named initializers for acpi_device_id

[Pawel Zalewski]

> Why is there a different explanation above the "---" than below "---" ?
 b4 will put the cover letter in the dropped section of a single patch
series, for more information please see [1]. There is no requirement
for them to be equal. The answer to your question is in the cover
letter itself: first series is a refactor pass to allow for the future
intended change in the acpi_device_id struct to go ahead without
triggering build errors. Describing future events in a git message
makes no sense to me.

> > Unify the list terminator to have a single space between the brackets and
> > no trailing comma.
>
> Why?
This seems to be explained in the paragraph above in the commit
message? I can repeat myself if it's not obvious.

[1] https://b4.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/contributor/prep.html#what-if-the-series-only-has-a-single-patch