Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] i2c: dev: clean up registration

[Wolfram Sang]

> If Wolfram insists, I can revisit this, but I don't think it's needed.

Well, I can see both sides. One the one hand, it is a bit of an academic
excercise, on the other hand it is more "correct".

I favor the incremental approach. I won't force Johan to do something
which he thinks is superfluous. But if someone interested sends such an
incremental patch, I'd vote for inclusion. And with all the code
analysis out there, I think such a patch will come eventually.

That being said, it means I could then apply this series to my for-andi
branch and add the comment I requested here myself. But I will wait
until tomorrow to wait for further comments, if any.