Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] mm: gup: introduce gup_unshared_pages()

[David Hildenbrand (Arm)]

On 11/10/26 22:27, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 03:23:15PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> On Tue, 2026-11-10 at 20:19 +0000, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
>>>
>>> Hmm, Wouldn't this name be semantically much the same as keeping
>>> the existing gup_unshared_page(), since both essentially convey that
>>> no unsharing is required from GUP's perspective?
>>
>> The function measures how many pages in
>> this current interval do not need to be
>> unshared.
>>
>> I'm happy with any name, though.
>>
>> I would really like to just see this
>> code go in, so I can post my two
>> GUP series on top, first the batching
>> for the GUP-slow path, and then the
>> series that allows access_remote_vm()
>> and friends to work under the per-VMA
>> lock.
> 
> @David, If you don't have any strong comments for original name
> -- gup_unshared_page(), May I post next version with resolving other
> comments so that Rik's series be posted soon?
> 
> Otherewise, gup_skip_unshare_pages() works for me.

Let me think ...

Maybe just throw in:

	gup_pages_not_requiring_unshare

A bit long, but who cares

-- 
Cheers,

David