Re: [PATCH v2 10/12] sched/fair: Reflow pick_task_fair() / newidle

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, Nov 11, 2026 at 01:02:45AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:

> an rq which it already updated now marked as not updated. Maybe
> double_rq_clock_clear_update() should follow __rq_clock_clear()?

Yes, definitely. I seem to have completely missed
double_rq_clock_clear_update() and somehow my test run; I promise, I
did one (although I didn't test sched_ext at all); didn't trigger
nothing :/