Re: [PATCH v2] mm/migrate: improve mlock tracking for PTE-mapped large folios
From: Kiryl Shutsemau
Date: Wed Nov 11 2026 - 14:03:14 EST
On Wed, Nov 11, 2026 at 09:00:10AM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 11/10/26 13:32, Wandun Chen wrote:
> > From: Wandun Chen <chenwandun@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Commit ab521b4142aa ("mm/rmap: improve mlock tracking for large folios")
> > mlocks a large folio when all its pages are added in one rmap operation.
> > However, when a PTE-mapped large folio is migrated, remove_migration_pte()
> > restores PTEs individually, passing nr_pages = 1 to the rmap helpers. As a
> > result, PG_mlocked is not set on the destination folio.
> >
> > Reclaim can restore mlock in try_to_unmap(), but Mlocked in /proc/meminfo
> > remains undercounted until that scan occurs.
> >
> > Restore mlock once the full mapping has been restored in a locked VMA
> > under one page table lock, rather than waiting for try_to_unmap() to
> > restore the mlock state.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wandun Chen <chenwandun@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > mm/migrate.c | 10 +++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> > index 94033c222e04..140e291d4587 100644
> > --- a/mm/migrate.c
> > +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> > @@ -353,6 +353,7 @@ static bool remove_migration_pte(struct folio *folio,
> > {
> > struct rmap_walk_arg *rmap_walk_arg = arg;
> > DEFINE_FOLIO_VMA_WALK(pvmw, rmap_walk_arg->folio, vma, addr, PVMW_SYNC | PVMW_MIGRATION);
> > + unsigned long nr_ptes = 0;
> >
> > while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
> > rmap_t rmap_flags = RMAP_NONE;
> > @@ -446,9 +447,16 @@ static bool remove_migration_pte(struct folio *folio,
> > else
> > folio_add_file_rmap_pte(folio, new, vma);
> > set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, pvmw.address, pvmw.pte, pte);
> > +
> > + nr_ptes++;
> > }
> > - if (READ_ONCE(vma->vm_flags) & VM_LOCKED)
> > + if (READ_ONCE(vma->vm_flags) & VM_LOCKED) {
> > + if (folio_test_large(folio) &&
> > + nr_ptes == folio_nr_pages(folio) &&
> > + !(pvmw.flags & PVMW_PGTABLE_CROSSED))
> > + mlock_vma_folio(folio, vma);
> > mlock_drain_local();
> > + }
> >
> > trace_remove_migration_pte(pvmw.address, pte_val(pte),
> > compound_order(new));
>
> I guess pte batching would be one way of handling it, but that requires more churn.
>
> The spirit is similar as in try_to_unmap_one(), where we count the number of
> ptes in one VMA. For consistency, I would call it "ptes".
>
> @Kiryl, can you take a look?
Looks right to me. Agreed on "ptes".
With that adjusted:
Reviewed-by: Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) <kas@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> BTW, why don't we care about that in try_to_migrate?
try_to_migrate_one() unmaps the folio whether the VMA is VM_LOCKED or
not, so there is no mapping left to keep mlocked; removing the rmap
munlocks the source.
The mlock is rebuilt on the destination in remove_migration_ptes(),
which is the path this patch fixes.
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov