Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/8] tpm: Add a single table for all TPM wait limits
From: Jarkko Sakkinen
Date: Sat Nov 14 2026 - 08:30:22 EST
On Sat, Nov 14, 2026 at 09:12:22AM +0000, Surendran Kanagaraj wrote:
> Makes sense. The quirk table is just a convenience, a common table fmt
> for drivers, and the chip still owns the table. Without it the driver
> calls tpm_limits_driver_set() for each limit it changes. I am happy to
> drop it in the next rev.
Yes as a general principle optimizing here "data redundancy" at the cost
of more complex code does not pay off.
>
> Thanks,
> Surendran
Br, Jarkko