Re: New sound maintainer?

Matthias Urlichs (smurf@smurf.noris.de)
Tue, 23 Apr 1996 16:23:00 +0100


In linux.dev.kernel, article <199604221913.PAA24445@zaphod.caz.ny.us>,
Buddha Buck <phaedrus@dreamscape.com> writes:
>=20
> >From what I remember, this part of the discussion was started by the=
=20
I _hate_ mailers which do that.

> change in licensing of the sound driver caused by Hannu's teaming up=20
> with a commercial developer. The concern is that the new licensing m=
ay=20
> be in conflict with the kernel, which is GPLed (and is thoroughly=20
> entrenched in that). This particular line was started when someone=20
> suggested that RMS might change the GPL to prohibit all binary=20
> distributions, not just ones where the source is unavailable. I=20
> personally don't think that that would fit with RMSs philosophy.

It also wouldn't work. Suppose you have one of these Slowaris boxes (no=
C
compiler), or you just buy a PC (no C compiler, no tar, no gzip, no mak=
e,
no *anything*...) how _do_ you get that box to run something more sensi=
ble?

--=20
She is descended from a long line that her mother listened to.
-- Gypsy Rose Lee
--=20
Matthias Urlichs \ Noris Network GmbH i.Gr/ Xlink-POP N=FCrnberg=
=20
Schleiermacherstra=DFe 12 \ Linux+Internet / EMail: urlichs@nor=
is.de
90491 N=FCrnberg (Germany) \ Consulting+Programming+Networking+etc'i=
ng
PGP: 1B 89 E2 1C 43 EA 80 44 15 D2 29 CF C6 C7 E0 DE=20
Click <A HREF=3D"http://smurf.noris.de/~smurf/finger">here</A>. =
42