Re: As 2.0 looms

Andrew E. Mileski (aem@nic.ott.hookup.net)
Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:22:51 -0400 (EDT)


For what it's worth, I'm 100% in agreement. AXP makes sense.

> I like a suggestion made earlier:
>
> Rename arch-dependent DEC Alpha stuff to AXP. i.e., instead of:
>
> .../linux/arch/alpha
>
> we could have:
>
> .../linux/arch/axp
>
> People know the DECChips as AXPs as well as Alphas. It would make
> sense, and that would let us keep the Alpha/Beta nomenclature for
> software completeness/functionality levels.

--
Andrew E. Mileski
mailto:aem@ott.hookup.net   http://www.redhat.com/~aem/
Linux Plug-and-Play Project http://www.redhat.com/pnp/
"You can't have everything. Where would you put it?" - Steven Wright