Re: Kernel functionality in user land
fuZZy (tjimenez@site.gmu.edu)
Thu, 4 Apr 1996 05:20:02 -0500 (EST)
> > 3.) Communication should always (no matter if internal or external) go over
> > the kerneld message queue (Is the overhead bearable for internal
> > communication? Is the kerneld message queue concept powerful enough? Can
> > the kerneld message queue be used for inside-kernel communication?)
> > This would give us much common code between internal and external
> > features.
isn't this more what the kernel network link was written for?
--
-fuZZy, paramour to the lady mindy
<did they buy it?>
<I don't think they bought it.>
<of course they bought it.>
<shush, they're looking this way, remember to keep a straight face...>