> Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> writes:
>
[...]
>
> >This is a classical aliasing situation; you are modifying *p
> >indirectly via buf. I think almost every compiler assumes
> >"no-pointer-aliasing" when optimizing; otherwise it's very hard to
> >optimize.
>
> When I was looking at the source to cse.c in gcc, it was apparent that
> gcc does not assume no-pointer-aliasing. I suppose it could actually
Then I was wrong.
Ulrich