Perhaps this is why mtools is 4 times faster than the Linux
filesystem code when copying a large file. This happens with
a 650kB file on a floppy and with a 4.3MB file on a Zip disk.
Zip drive example:
Use mcopy to duplicate a 4.3MB file: 1 minute
Use cp for same purpose on a mounted disk, sync: 4 minutes
> I added a really ugly hack that always causes the whole FAT to be read
> on the first access (if the FAT is small enough, i.e. on floppies).
> This keeps the whole FAT in the buffer cache and now I can read a
> complete disk without any unnecessary seeks. But this is definitely
> not the right solution, because other FSs (ext2, for example) seem to
> have similar problems.
I would imagine they have the problem but do not suffer as much.
This has something to do with the linear FAT structure. Still,
maybe ext2 could be quite a bit faster.