Re: As 2.0 looms

Alan Cox (alan@cymru.net)
Wed, 24 Apr 1996 14:02:28 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: SPARC Linux"
Previous message: Harvey Fishman: "Re: Must modules be GPL'ed?"
In reply to: Robert Riggs: "Re: memtest86, built into kernel"
Next in thread: Mike Shaver: "Re: As 2.0 looms"

> Yes. And the 'Do you want to be offered ALPHA test drivers' needs to be
> moved to the top of ./drivers/net/Config.in so that it can be applied to
> *all* drivers, and not just ether drivers as it is at present.

I'd move it to the very top as "ALPHA test features", and cover stuff
like bridge, multicast route, any non network drivers that are test,
UFS, Amiga FFS etc with it.

[On etherexpress-16]
> and nothing broke. So this might be one candidate to "de-alpha" if
> others using them continuously have also not encountered problems.

Yep.

Alan

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: SPARC Linux"
Previous message: Harvey Fishman: "Re: Must modules be GPL'ed?"
In reply to: Robert Riggs: "Re: memtest86, built into kernel"
Next in thread: Mike Shaver: "Re: As 2.0 looms"