> On 1 May 96 at 16:51, Joe wrote:
>
> > The patch below adds an entry to /proc that represents the CFLAGS
> > definition passed to gcc at compile time.
>
> Do we really need this? Why not adding it to /proc/version (if you
> think you'll need it)?
>
Hmm, After seeing this, I think I'll write a /proc/kitchen_sink, or
/proc/rubbish/kitchen_sink. Wha'dya think ?
Bryn
-- PGP key pass phrase forgotten, \ Overload -- core meltdown sequence again :( | initiated. / This space is intentionally left | blank, apart from this text ;-) \____________________________________