Re: Linux96? Linux97! :)

Craig Milo Rogers (rogers@isi.edu)
Mon, 13 May 96 10:26:47 PDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: Why touch the CMOS clock?"
Previous message: Jason Duerstock: "pre2.0.3 oops"
In reply to: Kevin Lentin: "Re: Linux96? Linux97! :)"

>Will it be called 2.0.1? That's not a nice version number. I'd hope for
>2.0 and call the first patch 2.0.1. Even 2.0.0 looks a little ugly. Linux 2
>would be nice.

So long as we don't call it "Linux/2"... ;-)

Craig Milo Rogers

Next message: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: Why touch the CMOS clock?"
Previous message: Jason Duerstock: "pre2.0.3 oops"
In reply to: Kevin Lentin: "Re: Linux96? Linux97! :)"