lilo:
> On Sun, 12 May 1996, Joe Fouche wrote:
>
> > 1) Configuration still seems a tiny bit illogical. For example,
> > it asks certain things (like CONFIG_ETHERNET) in weird places.
> > Also, maybe the (NEW) thing shouldn't appear when .config doesn't
> > already exist?
>
> NO!!!! Many of us copy our .config from the previous kernel tree into
> arch/<whatever/defconfig of the new kernel tree, as a last step before
> running `make mrproper' and compiling the new kernel.
So?
I'm just saying that if .config is nonexistent, it doesn't make sense
to say that CONFIG_FLOPPY is a (NEW) driver. But, if something is
*not* in defconfig, I agree, it makes sense for the (NEW) to
be printed.
I'll work on this modification, eventually.
.-.
. |-
-- -- | |
\_/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQBFAwUBMZf6wsaxFdsA0XPZAQEb7AGAg1ch0dK/8csH1DaMLnC/+YdH7vpbMwMb
wY+jW9nkejzt3D0TjbOLMMSAqz5HUoAl
=4nDZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----