Re: CONFIG_RANDOM (compromise?)
Herbert Rosmanith (herp@wildsau.idv.uni-linz.ac.at)
Sat, 25 May 1996 02:19:40 +0200 (MET DST)
> > > > There's also an argument that the random number generator causes
> > > > unnecessary overhead for people who never use it, and should therefore
> > > > be made an option. However, I have not yet seen anyone post
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> > Personaly I have no need for it too.
> >
> If we go on dropping off useless stuff there are a _lot_ of candidates
> from me...
I was replying to this sentence.