Re: 2 Ether cards for more bandwidth?

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Mon, 27 May 1996 21:44:54 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Laszlo Vecsey: "Linux-pre2.0.8: SCSI oops!"
Previous message: Roeland Th. Jansen: "Re: libg++ and ldconfig"
In reply to: Andrew E. Mileski: "Re: 2 Ether cards for more bandwidth?"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: CONFIG_RANDOM option for 1.99.2 [OFF-OFF-OFFTOPIC]"

> well, if you are running a network of machines connected via 2 cables
> (ie 2 parallel networks) you'd have a boots...but why bother? Wouldn't
> it be easier to move up to FDDI? (Dies Linux support any fiber cards?)

Not to my knowledge, but 100BaseT is far cheaper anyway. There is also
some ATM support from ethz you can download

Next message: Laszlo Vecsey: "Linux-pre2.0.8: SCSI oops!"
Previous message: Roeland Th. Jansen: "Re: libg++ and ldconfig"
In reply to: Andrew E. Mileski: "Re: 2 Ether cards for more bandwidth?"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: CONFIG_RANDOM option for 1.99.2 [OFF-OFF-OFFTOPIC]"