Re: More envelope info on "Socket destroy delayed"

Alan Cox (alan@cymru.net)
Tue, 28 May 1996 11:01:49 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: emoenke: "Re: umount problem (was: Re: umount problem with sbpcd)"
Previous message: Martin.Dalecki: "Re: CONFIG_RANDOM (compromise?)"
In reply to: Tom May: "More envelope info on "Socket destroy delayed""

> Which still doesn't explain why I can't connect to samba from my NT
> machine with kernels that print the "Socket delay destroyed" message.

Probably unrelated. The odd sock destroy delayed is normal

Next message: emoenke: "Re: umount problem (was: Re: umount problem with sbpcd)"
Previous message: Martin.Dalecki: "Re: CONFIG_RANDOM (compromise?)"
In reply to: Tom May: "More envelope info on "Socket destroy delayed""