Re: The symbols from kernel 1.99.14 don't match 1.99.14

Bjorn Ekwall (bj0rn@blox.se)
Sun, 9 Jun 1996 12:45:32 +0200 (MET DST)

James B. MacLean <macleajb@ednet.ns.ca> wrote:
> On Jun 7, 1:08pm, Dave Baker wrote:
> > >> gcc2_compiled. undefined
> > >> [snip]
> > >> Failed to load module! The symbols from kernel 1.99.14 don't match 1.99.14
> > isn't this just the bug that requires upgrading to modules1.3.69k ??

Yup! (or just applying my web-page patch for modules-1.3.57)

> At my site
> it was due to compiling the kernel with all the CONFIG_MOD... on etc...
> but NOT having the first option for allowing experimental options
> (CONFIG_EXPERMINTAL).

Strange... Why do _I_ never have any of those problems... :-)
Perhaps my setup behaves because of its close proximity to Finland...

OTOH there might be problems with some modules if the _modules_ are
guarded by CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL. Was that it?

Bjorn <bj0rn@blox.se> <http://www.pi.se/blox/>