> > You have to remember you have open, read, possibly seek, and close, 3 to
> > 5 times per second. meter-0.2 or Portato code in the kernel would add 8k
> > at the very most, as well as better interactive time, especially on
> > smaller 386 systems.
>
> Oh tragedy. Do you have any idea how tiny a load that is.
>
> > We have to think of the humble 386SX16 users too... I have a P5, but a
> > 386, too. Portato makes the system load go up noticeably. Not to 2.0 or
> > anything, but noticeably.
>
> Humble 386SX users will get far more benefit from 2 pages of pageable user
> memory.
>
> Alan
>
I do belive you... You are obviously have more experience with the kernel
internals than I.. :-) But, to quote the Portato and meter/meter-0.2
documentation:
*** About the original meter:
"Next I compiled the original version which worked but spawning off a ps
every .75 secs to collect CPU usage tended to adversely affect the CPU
usage of my friend's 386SX/16 :-) This was a bad thing. The code was an
ugly hack but I don't hold that against it. The idea is great."
*** About the new meter:
"Most noteably, this program impacts your system a lot less than the
previous versions. Okay, maybe if you've a 486DX4/100 then spawning off
ps's every 3/4ths of a second doesn't even cause your machine to slow
down a nano-sec, but for those of you with less studly systems, I'm sure
you'll apreciate this kinder version."
Now, wouldn't a kernel module be totally kind to the system...
and remember, two page optional modules aren't bloat in my opinion... The
Microsoft NT 4.0 build 1314 (beta 2 CD) kernel is about 4MB in memory.
THAT is bloat! :-)
-- Jeff Johnson GCS d- s: !a C+++ UA++(+++) P+ L+ trn@gate.net E---- W+++ N+++(+++++) K- w(+) O(-) KE4QWX M- V-(--) PS+ PE Y++ PGP+++(+++++) t- http://www.gate.net/~trn 5 X+++(+++++) R tv+ b++ DI-- D G++ e* !h r y? Nerdity Test = 66% Hacker Test = 45% 1024/3397E001 1995/06/10 5B 92 8B 34 84 E9 42 26 DC FB F7 C4 1E 0E 80 29