Re: 2.0, loggings, cpu quotas, 2.1 issues, etc.
Systemkennung Linux (linux@mailhost.uni-Koblenz.de)
Tue, 11 Jun 1996 21:04:47 +0200 (MET DST)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Herbert Rosmanith: "Re: 2.0, loggings, cpu quotas, 2.1 issues, etc."
- Previous message: Matty: "Re: ld.so-1.8.0 and make problems"
- In reply to: Herbert Wengatz: "Re: 2.0, loggings, cpu quotas, 2.1 issues, etc."
- Next in thread: Jeff Johnson: "Re: 2.0, loggings, cpu quotas, 2.1 issues, etc."
Hi,
> Hmmmm. I don't know _THAT_ many big numbercrunchers, that are running LINUX right now...
> (But I'd like to see that! ;-) )
Effizient SMP on machines with more than just a handfull of CPUs is
defiantely on the to-do-list for 2.1 so Linux *will* be used on machines
where billing is of interest. I'd just like to call the AP1000 project as
one example.
(Hmm ... someone offered me a used numbercruncher during the Linux Kongress.
Thought about porting Linux to it but didn't want a 13kW monster in my
flat ...)
Ralf
- Next message: Herbert Rosmanith: "Re: 2.0, loggings, cpu quotas, 2.1 issues, etc."
- Previous message: Matty: "Re: ld.so-1.8.0 and make problems"
- In reply to: Herbert Wengatz: "Re: 2.0, loggings, cpu quotas, 2.1 issues, etc."
- Next in thread: Jeff Johnson: "Re: 2.0, loggings, cpu quotas, 2.1 issues, etc."