Re: 2.0, loggings, cpu quotas, 2.1 issues, etc.
Alan Cox (alan@cymru.net)
Wed, 12 Jun 1996 09:47:53 +0100 (BST)
> > Make that a chargeable group and we get the ability to partition a big
> > machine up by department and to do sensible charging schemes. For big number
> > crunchers that is an issue.
> A wonderful idea. Would imposing a memory usage quota be a extrememly
> difficult task, Alan?
I can see some semantics issues like who do you charge for a shared page,
both, half each, ... (I like half each as it will encourage people to run
two of the same job at once as its cheaper on machine resources!)
A;lan