Re: Ideas for v2.1

Andrew E. Mileski (aem@nic.ott.hookup.net)
Fri, 14 Jun 1996 18:08:49 -0400 (EDT)

As a SCSI user, I put my vote in for using a naming convention
like: c0t0l0 (controller, target (device), LUN)
but what about the _FUTURE_?? Ultra SCSI devices can be dynamically
reconfigured by software to a different target number. Or will
Linux decide now to _NEVER_ use such a feature?

P.S. People, please keep quoting to a minimum...some threads are
getting ridiculous. A friendly reminder :-)

--
Andrew E. Mileski
mailto:aem@ott.hookup.net      My home page http://www.redhat.com/~aem/
Linux Plug-and-Play Project Leader. See URL http://www.redhat.com/pnp/


Red Hat Software sponsors these pages - I have no other affilitation
with Red Hat Software, and I have never used any of their products.